navstokgap

Atlas of halving: what one refinement step does, and what emerges, in each dimension

Markdown source · PDF

Purpose, 2026-09-27 (user direction: a collective understanding of the halving of the lattice and what emerges in each case and dimension, as the mid-term goal). This note is the shared map. Each cell says what one halving does, what it leaves behind, and what survives the limit, with the status of the statement and the note that holds it. It adds no new theorem; it fixes one vocabulary so that the agents working here (Claude, GPT-6 Astra, Fable reviewers) and the user fill the same cells. Open cells are listed in §5.

Status labels: proved (theorem in a repository note, reviewed or not as marked), exact (closed-form identity), formal (derivation assuming an unproved estimate), known (established literature, cited), open.

1. The operation

Halving one direction \(a_1\mapsto a_1/2\) of a lattice with plaquette heat times \(t_{\mu\nu}=\lambda_Da_\mu a_\nu/\prod_{\rho\ne\mu,\nu}a_\rho\) (series/parallel note, eq. (1), small-field regime) splits exactly into two moves.

Newton’s halving is the one-dimensional case: inserting a time \(t_{2.6}\) in a cell is a series move (refinement note, §2). A physical record at the inserted time is a new variable attached to the body, the analogue of a parallel insertion. Forgetting a Gaussian record is an exact parallel move with defect proportional to \(\hbar^2\), the identity for \(\hbar=0\) (record as parallel move).

1b. Cuts at any position (user remarks, 2026-09-27/28)

Halving is the easiest cut; a cut at any fraction \(s\in(0,1)\) of a cell performs the same two moves, with \(s\) as a parameter.

2. The atlas by dimension

\(1+n\) Series move Parallel planes per halving What one step leaves What survives the limit Status and notes
\(0+0\) none (a single weight) none the weight \(k_t(U)\) itself; a single integral with an \(e^{-c/\hbar}\) structure a large-\(N\) transition (Gross–Witten) known; dimension ladder
\(1+0\) Newton exact after one cubic counterterm \(-F^2h^3/(24M)\); the defect \(-F^2uvh/(8M)\) is a coboundary none a scalar unobserved: the exact propagator at every \(\hbar\); recorded: a floor only if joint determinacy fails proved; refinement note, fifth postulate
\(1+1\) exact (heat-kernel convolution) 0 nothing for heat kernels; for any action, \(a^{-2}(1-\hat c_R)\) a conjugation-invariant Lévy exponent \(\psi(R)\); Yang–Mills iff Lindeberg; circle spectrum \(\hbar cL\psi(R)\); no local particle proved (Theorem 2 of the zero-spacing note); known (Lévy)
\(1+2\) exact 1 free: an irrelevant quadratic form of relative size \(a^2K^2/16+(Ga)^2/8\); \(U(1)\): vortices of density \(e^{-\pi^2/(8t)}\); \(SU(N)\): coupling shifts \(O(t)\), curvature term explicit free photon for \(U(1)\) at fixed \(\lambda_3\) (every lattice gap dies); conjectured gap \(C_3\hbar c\lambda_3\) for \(SU(N)\) proved for free and \(U(1)\); formal for \(SU(N)\) (Proposition 7); see §3
\(1+3\) exact 3 \(t=g^2\) fixed: coupling shifts that recur each step; large fields suppressed only as \((a\Lambda)^{2b_0c}\) running coupling, \(\Lambda=\mu e^{-1/(2b_0g^2)}\); small instantons die (\(11N/3>4\)); dislocations need \(c>2/b_0\) (\(\tfrac{6}{11}\) of an instanton for \(SU(2)\)); \(U(1)\): Coulomb phase known (running, 6/11 criterion, Driver); the measure-level route fails for \(U(1)\) (proved)
\(1+n\), \(n\ge4\) exact \(\binom n2\) \(t\) grows as \(a\to0\) no small-field regime; a phase transition, no established continuum limit known (Creutz for \(SU(2)\) in 5D)

The same heat time \(t=\hbar g_{\rm cl}^2a^{4-D}\) controls the column “what one step leaves”. For \(D<4\) refining and taking \(\hbar\to0\) push it the same way; in mechanics refining makes each cell more quantum (dimension ladder, §2).

3. The atlas for \(1+2\) by group

Group Isolated cube Full mid-plane One step, measure level Iteration and limit
free (\(\mathbb R^n\)) exact exact defect (Proposition 2 of the series/parallel note) Gaussian, exact blocked actions converge to a Gaussian fixed point (known, Bell–Wilson; for this blocking asserted)
\(U(1)\) exact (Proposition 3) exact charge form, vortex bound (Proposition 4, Corollary) one step equals the free step up to density \(e^{-\pi^2/(8t)}\) (Theorem 5, refereed); whole measure within TV \(2(L/a)^3e^{-\pi^2/(6\lambda_3a)}\) of the monopole-free part (monopole note) free photon (Gross 1983, known)
\(SU(2)\) midpoint characters exact for every spin; spin-\(\frac12\) and spin-1 cube sectors exact, with matrix image bounds for spin 1 (closed form, Theorems 1–4) formal order-\(t\) expansion: cut shifts positive, transverse negative; other local operators have dimension at least six; explicit torus winding term formal; one-step normalized small-field bound against a covariant reference proved (small-field §§13–14); iteration open open
\(SU(3)\) curvature term explicit, softening \(t_j|X_j|^2/512\) (group-general form of Proposition 6) small-field one-step normalized bounds transcribed from \(SU(2)\), \(\mathbb Z_3\) sectors, bridge tail by Li–Yau (small-field §16, refereed by Astra with corrections); bulk order-\(t\) coefficients \(\frac32\) times \(SU(2)\)’s (order-\(t\) §7b); large fields open formal open; the gap \(C_3\hbar c\lambda_3\) is the infrared obligation

4. What emerges, read across the atlas

Why ultraviolet halvings bear on an infrared gap is explained, for the paper, in the didactic note.

5. Open cells

  1. \(SU(2)\) cube: filled through \(J=1\) (Theorem 4, exact diagonal entries, image bounds and cube sector); \(J>1\) entries and control of the full spin sum remain open.
  2. \(SU(2)\) full mid-plane in \(1+2\): order-\(t\) calculation refereed as formal; small-field note §§12–14, Rounds 14–16, refereed by Claude: a covariant Gaussian reference with ’t Hooft flux sectors, and normalized weak P(\(1/2-\delta\)) against it for one barriered step, uniformly in plane size, for equal and unequal boundary layers with the cut faces budgeted (saddle determinant, Laplace remainder and amplitudes included; remainder densities face-local in size). Rounds 17–24 (§§17–24, refereed): the pair kernel (89), the link-coordinate form of (27), and the separated third response (93) hold on the barriered chart with explicit constants, uniformly in plane size; all-order response identities and a barrier-jet obstruction (§23); an undifferentiated small-field/large-field split with joint bad-set rarity \(p^{|H|/16}\) (§24); the error exponent \(\alpha'=\frac12-3\delta\), \(\delta<\frac1{10}\), absorbing the proved bare scales (§25); the full response through third order, contacts included (§26, refereed). §27 gives the three-bad-component tree bound (120), with rarity \(p^{M/64}\) and decay \(\frac12\log(12/5)\); §28 gives a factorizing reference, uniform convexity and rarity along real decoupling paths, and the one-connector bound (128) (both written, unrefereed). §29 controls arbitrary connector moments and connected growth, and gives a uniform complex \(\ell^1\) source ball. §30 proves the anchored two-connector tree (135) and its summed spatial reserve (140), with the earlier gradient bound retained after a proof repair. §31 proves all-order anchored attachments (142) and a zero-free uniform polydisc at the exact Gaussian, unbarriered endpoint (Sol/Astra, written). §32 isolates a pointwise complex-logarithm failure and proves the direct all-order density norm (148) with radial barriers in a factorized reference (2026-09-30, Sol/Astra, refereed). §33 gives a convergent nonlinear interaction expansion with retained barriers, uniform weak-recoupling polydisc (154) and fixed spatial reserve (Sol/Astra, refereed). §34 proves the marked norm (157) with rarity and fixed spatial reserve (Sol/Astra, refereed). §35 proves the all-order connected target (116) in the weak strip, with constants (166) and fixed decay independent of order (Sol/Astra, refereed). §36 gives exact dressed hard-core activities satisfying both numerical budgets (112) in the strip, with condition \(\log(1/p)\ge640\) and connector-source norm (Sol/Astra, refereed). §37 gives a fixed moving-mean source radius and the subtracted barrier norm (177) in a centered quadratic model (Sol/Astra, refereed). Next: complex centered nonlinear bounds and the moving saddle’s decaying source dependence; reject barrier differentiation and amplification on every good connector. Full (113), recoupling to one and contact cancellation remain open. Then target (94); then target-covering paths, curvature conversion, full-integral comparison, perturbed-action stability and iteration. The fixed-frame transport-value comparison remains open; Proposition 4’s rejection stands.
  3. Stability of Hypothesis P(\(\alpha\)) under iteration. For \(U(1)\) in \(1+2\), reduced to exact Gaussian blocking (Corollary 2\('\) of the monopole note); open for \(SU(N)\).
  4. \(1+3\): composition, Thms 1–4 refereed by Claude; §7 gives generated cubic/quartic kernels, decay, finite one-step subtracted matching with explicit constants and uniform iteration hypotheses (Round 10, formal, unrefereed); G1 refereed. Open: its (14), uniform subtracted cubic/quartic contractions; sublinear endpoint matching and remainder sum give the average \(-2b_0\log2\) (conditional Theorem 4; one-step shifts refereed).
  5. Time-only halving. Structural reading, 2026-09-27, of known results. At fixed spatial lattice the electric faces make the series moves: heat-kernel electric weights are a semigroup in the time step, so they compose exactly. The magnetic faces make the parallel moves: with exponential weights \(e^{-a_0V}\) they close exactly in their own family, since products of such weights add the exponents. The whole defect of a time halving is the non-commutation of the two families, and it vanishes as \(a_0\to0\) by the Trotter product formula (Trotter 1959; Chernoff 1968; metadata; strong convergence for the Laplacian on \(G^E\) plus a bounded magnetic potential). This is why the Hamiltonian limit (Kogut and Susskind 1975; transfer matrix: Creutz 1977; metadata) exists at every fixed spatial lattice, while spatial halving leaves the non-closing factor \(\Psi\). Open: an operator-norm rate, which needs domain estimates for the commutator of the Laplacian with \(V\).
  6. Filled 2026-09-27 for Gaussian records (record as parallel move): forgetting a record convolves momentum with variance \(\hbar^2/(4\sigma^2)\); precisions add in parallel; refinement converges iff \(\sum\sigma_j^{-2}<\infty\); identity for \(\hbar=0\). Complete-record tests, §§6–7 (2026-09-29, written, unrefereed): the repaired two-pointer model obeys the area floor iff its readout error/kick determinant remains at least \(\kappa^2\) conditional on side records; a noisy kick monitor breaks a marginally saturated repair. Adaptive affinity is exact in the branchwise information (41); monitor replacement has cost (46). All refinements, §§3b–3d construct the harmonic curve across unequal, nonnested partitions and arbitrary start/end kick mixtures, following the Lean norm obstacle (Sol/Astra, checked). The RG/’t Hooft comparison separates curve universality, dimensional scale and action normalization. Exact retained weights define the RG transformation; their overall action factor rescales the quantum denominator as in (6q), with \(c,\hbar,G\) kept explicit. Complete-record comparisons retain the conditional noise budget (49). Hamiltonian memory, §8 realizes the monitor cost and proves terminal posterior closure from the joint initial covariance restriction; linear blocking preserves it for the same body. §§8.4–8.6 give a genuine two-time physical copy refinement with an explicit relative kick and joint-law defect (62), and a partition-uniform complete-record information bound (63), even at zero action (Sol/Astra, written). §§8.7–8.9 retain every copy kick in associative Gaussian descriptors and prove a partition-independent projected terminal law with the explicit mesh rate (73). The three-cell residue (69) has rank two; the prescribed pair plus one independent additive scalar cannot reproduce it (2026-09-30, Sol/Astra, refereed). §8.10 includes physical adaptive gains and their conjugate recoil, with complete-record posterior closure (76) and uniform continuity (77). §§8.11–8.14 construct a continuous body–record law for the fixed physical weighted-record policy, with path-Cauchy estimate (89), partition independence, body curve (90) and posterior closure under the entire declared limiting record (92) (Sol/Astra, refereed). The limiting evolution (96) and smeared controller recoil (98) use the same finite pointer increments. §8.15 disproves extension to unrestricted nonlinear classical body copies (103); the quantum reference supplies a curvature term (104) and an explicit Wigner-negativity witness (105). Its exact finite generator §8.16 preserves record statistics while changing conditional momentum variance (107); a positive classical transition family on the full canonical phase space cannot realize it (109). §§8.17–8.18 show that weak nonlinear copies fail under every subdivision and the full coordinate-record path, with uniform small-exposure probability
    1. and a bounded curvature test (116) (Sol/Astra, refereed). §8.19 gives a finite free-record witness (122) against a local-score-only state and its exact two-packet coherence completion (123) (Sol/Astra, refereed). §8.20 restores exact phase reconstruction with positive tails, but proves failure of uniform stability (128) in the specified local-data metric; additive bridge-phase memory (129) retains the datum (Sol/Astra, refereed). §8.21 gives the exact fixed-density bridge reduction and unread score/current energy excesses (Sol, written, unrefereed); these are static spatial identities, with physical phase transport open. §8.22 realizes the score correction by correlated classical preparation and canonical copies; terminal conjugate access recovers the body (140), and free Newtonian transport fails (144) (Sol/Astra, written, internally checked). §8.23 repairs the Gaussian target by a stationary switching process and balances mean kinetic energy; its force needs preparation information in (151) (Sol/Astra, written, internally checked). Score-constrained ensembles gives the restricted field action and full transport-conjugate action, including reservoirs. Fixed compact transfer shapes fail even with Gaussian width; an evolving mode instead has an exact positive non-Gaussian forward completion. A nonlinear copy generates a quartic tail outside finite modes and an exact unread recoil cost (Sol/Astra, written, internally checked). Its §§6–8 (Fable, written, unrefereed) realize the two-sheet dynamics on every positive solution and for all forward time on that orbit, with exact mean cancellation of force and switch power; the controller is the field pair within this architecture and, after records, the record-dependent data of its family (refereed by GPT-6.1 Sol via Codex, corrections applied), branch controllers pass the two-unread-width test against a variance witness, and closure under coordinate copies holds at every \(\kappa\ge0\) under a branch-dependent protocol. Composition closure selects no \(\kappa\), so the apparatus-closure route to positivity is closed. Zero-branch reachability locates the gap thesis: Galileo’s Gaussian comparison has a record family constant in \(h\); determinate preparations lose the \(h\to0\) limit of their complete record after the first fold (exact for inertia with graded velocity, fold time \(m/\max(-p_0')\)), smeared records never do. Its Thm 4 separates the force laws in the anomaly record (Hooke rigid for every \(h\), a Kepler swarm loses the zero branch once its windings overlap, at the lapping time of order \(T^2/\Delta T\)), and §§3b–3c identify the invariant discontinuous at zero, the leading fringe visibility \(2\sqrt{\rho_1\rho_2}/(\rho_1+\rho_2)\), full when the record and preparation imprecision actions are small compared with \(h\) (refereed by GPT-6.1 Sol (Codex), corrections applied). Continuity (91) also survives zero action. Adaptive timing, extra readouts and the independent positive scale remain open.
  7. The infrared: from ultraviolet control in \(1+2\) to \(C_3>0\).
  8. Cuts at any position (§1b), open rows: the free-field independence of the limit from the cut sequence (a convergence question for the discrete-exterior-calculus Hodge star on nested tensor grids); for \(SU(3)\), whether triadic refinement, the only kind whose image terms reach the centre (centre note), organizes the large-field terms better than dyadic refinement.

6. Consequence for STATE

STATE carries the mid-term goal and points here. Each result that fills a cell updates the cell in this note and nothing else; the notes that prove results remain the record.